If a white person were to kill another white person they would, quite rightly, be punished. But if the same white person were to kill a black or Asian person then the punishment would be stiffer than for killing a white man.
Why is that twisted approach allowed? Because crimes which, supposedly, are motivated by "hate" (racial, religious, disability or homophobic) mean the sentence will be stiffer than for a "non hate" crime where the victim is a heterosexual, able-bodied white person.
This is probably why the murders of white people by blacks and Asians, and the murders of non-Muslims by Muslims are never classed as "hate" crimes, so that ethnics can never be sentenced as harshly as British people for committing the same sorts of crime.
How often do you read a report of a white person being attacked by ethnics only to see the words that it was "not racially motivated" thereby ensuring that ethnics are treated less harshly than British people in the courts.
Why should your life be worth less if you are white British, heterosexual or able bodied? This appalling discrimination against our own people should end.
