No one should face jail for having an opinion!

Yesterday this story emerged in the news about the mayor in the Irish town of Naas and comments he made regarding black Africans in his town. Not surprisingly, the left and the "do gooders" are calling for him to be fined, or even jailed, for his views.

What a dangerous road to go down - throwing someone in jail just because the views and opinions they hold are deemed to be "incorrect".

I truly hope that Darren Scully will not be imprisoned for his views.

More legalised ageism?

While any attempt to encourage firms to employ more British people are to be encouraged, I have to admit that I do not like the sound of this idea.

If companies are given financial incentives to take on inexperienced school leavers, in time they will be the only ones who can find work, apart from professionals.

‘If we gave employers £1,500 as a cash subsidy to take on a 16-year-old, they might take on a 16-year-old with lack of work experience and sometimes poor qualifications rather than a migrant worker or a mature worker who has got those skills.

Denying opportunities to "mature workers" is age discrimination.

Libyans to be imported for NHS treatment

My prediction made on 19th April that Libyans would be imported for treatment on the NHS has proved to be correct.

Today this report appeared in a regional newspaper.

Nice to know they will be spending weeks in our hospitals. When British pensioners are in our NHS hospitals we hear of them dying of malnutrition, being served with legal papers to force them out of hospital beds, we hear of people being denied life saving drugs because they are "too expensive" or "not cost effective", we have "postcode lotteries" where certain treatments are not available to people if they live in the wrong area, we have people having operations cancelled because there are no beds available. Will the Libyan bed-blockers be treated in such a disgusting way? No they will not, that only happens if you are British!

(You can also bet that, if the foreign bed blockers need physiotherapy, it will be provided and they won't have to wait six months, unlike British patients!)

Guy Gibson's dog was NOT called "Digger"

Today it was revealed that the remake of the "Dambusters" film will see Guy Gibson's dog - a black Labrador -having its name changed from "Nigger" to "Digger".

Quite rightly, people are disgusted and offended by this latest rewriting of our history to suit the PC brigade. It is supposedly being done to avoid causing offence to American audiences.

What about the offence caused to British people who see their proud history constantly being re-written to suit PC brigades? The dog was called NIGGER, it was not called DIGGER, TRIGGER or bloody TIGGER.

The story can be found here.

Medicines for Libya but not for English and Welsh cancer patients

Taxpayers in England and Wales will no doubt be delighted to know that Britain will send £2million in aid to Libya (this includes medical supplies) while at the same time denying English and Welsh renal cancer patients life saving drugs on the grounds that it is "too expensive".

How can we afford to send aid to every third world country but refuse to spend any on life saving treatment for our own people?

And how long will it be before we are importing Libyans to take up British hospital beds and in some cases even receive treatment which might not be available to our own people?

Where British priorities REALLY lie

The story that an ex-soldier who fought in Afghanistan is forced to sleep in a car, while a family of Afghan immigrants is provided with a large house, at taxpayers' expense, will offend normal people, but we shouldn't be surprised.

The fact that the government is slashing our defence budget while spending millions on arming rebels in Libya (some of whom are known supporters of al Qaeda) is nothing short of scandalous but is only to be expected from a country which values foreigners above its own people and puts the rights and comforts of immigrants and terrorists before law-abiding British people.

It is no good saying that the British public should remember all this when going out to vote on election day, they will still vote for the same old parties, the same old anti-British policies and then they have the audacity to moan when the government puts foreigners first.

Where is the "diversity" in a jobs fair for blacks and Asians?

Here is a definition of the word "diversity":

the condition of having or being composed of differing elements : variety; especially : the inclusion of different types of people (as people of different races or cultures) in a group or organization

Note the words "differing elements" - emphasis on "differing".

So how come a recruitment and information fair for blacks and Asians can be called a "Diversity Fair"? Where is the diversity in events solely for non-white people? A workforce could hardly be described as "diverse" if it consisted solely of coloured could it?

More on this fair here.